The Opening Bell by NEA
Educators Criticize LA Times Teacher Performance Database. The Los Angeles Times (8/30, Song) reports, “National and local teachers unions sharply criticized [The Los Angeles Times] on Sunday when the newspaper published a database of about 6,000 third- through fifth-grade city school teachers ranked by their effectiveness in raising student test scores.” The rankings are based “a ‘value-added’ analysis” that “looks at previous student test performance and estimates how much a teacher added to or subtracted from a student’s progress.” United Teachers Los Angeles officials say that making teacher rankings public could “create mistrust among schools and parents.” On Sept. 14, UTLA plans to “protest in front of the Times building.” UTLA President AJ Duffy said of the plans, “We want to make a public statement about our concern for our members who are being singled out.”
ABC News (8/29, Bruce) reported on its website that Education Secretary Arne Duncan supports using value-added data “to evaluate teachers.” In an interview on Sunday, Duncan told ABC, “Teachers want to get better. It shouldn’t take a newspaper to give them that data. The district, the union, the education stakeholders have to work together to empower teachers. This should be a piece of how teachers are evaluated.”
Study Criticizes “Value-Added” Teacher Evaluation Method. Valerie Strauss wrote in a blog for the Washington Post (8/29), “Student standardized test scores are not reliable indicators of how effective any teacher is in the classroom, not even with the addition of new ‘value-added’ methods, according to a study released today” by the Economic Policy Institute.

